← Back to Insights

Personal information stored outside South Africa is rarely a decision anyone sat down and made. It happens when a payroll package, a school communication app, a survey tool or a cloud backup is switched on, and the servers behind it turn out to be in another country. For employers, HR managers, school administrators and SME owners, the practical question is a plain one: where does our people's information actually go, and can anyone say so with confidence?

A common belief is that this is a technical matter for the IT provider or the software vendor. Section 72 of the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA), headed "Transfers of personal information outside Republic", points elsewhere. It places the duty on the responsible party in South Africa, which is the organisation that decides why and how the information is processed. The vendor's terms matter, but the organisation is the one answerable for the decision to use the service.

Personal information outside South Africa: the five grounds in Section 72

The section says that a responsible party in the Republic may not transfer personal information about a data subject to a third party in a foreign country unless one of five grounds applies. In plain terms:

Whether a particular arrangement, such as storage with a foreign cloud provider, amounts to a transfer, and which ground would fit, is a legal question that belongs with legal counsel. At the time of writing (October 2026), the guidance notes listed on the Information Regulator's website do not include one on cross-border transfers, so organisations are working from the text of the Act itself.

How to find out where your data goes

What an organisation can do without waiting for anyone is find out what it is actually using. The usual gap is not a missing clause. It is that the privacy notice describes the tools the organisation intended to use, while staff are using others: a free survey form, a messaging app, a personal cloud folder, an email marketing platform added by one department.

How the check works in practice

The working method at Kevin Bishop Consulting treats this as an operationalisation question rather than a documentation one. The list of tools that hold staff, learner or client information is built from what people say they do and, where possible, checked on site. For each tool, the hosting location and the terms that apply are recorded. Each finding is scored before it is discussed, so the conversation starts from a ranked set of remediable starting points rather than a verdict. It is the evidence-against-requirement discipline of an ISO 9001-style audit, applied to personal information, and it suits a Gauteng school or a ten-person firm as well as a larger employer.

One action for this week

One action is enough for this week: ask each department head to list the apps and online services that hold personal information, and to note where each is hosted. Then compare that list with what the organisation's Privacy Policy tells people about who receives their information. The same logic applies to the records a PAIA Section 51 manual must describe: a document is only useful when it matches what the organisation really holds. For organisations that want a starting point on where they stand across both Acts, the POPIA/PAIA Readiness Snapshot is a desktop, self-reported readiness rating.

Related reading:

This article is general information, not legal advice. For how Section 72 applies to a specific arrangement, speak to legal counsel. Kevin Bishop Consulting supports South African organisations with POPIA and PAIA compliance work, and if you would like to talk through where your organisation's information goes, get in touch.